Furnishing of information to CIC under Sec. 25 of the RTI Act 2005
(Period from 01/10/2010 to 31/12/2010)

Back to Index Page

 

S.No.

Information pertaining to UPSC

(a)No. of requests received

529

(b)No. of decisions where applications were not entitled to access the document pursuant to the requests, the provisions of this Act under which these decisions were made and the number of times such provisions were invoked:

 119

Under section 8(1)(c)-04 time, 8(1)(d)-07 times,  8(1)(e)-13 times, 8(1)(g)-01 time,  8(1)(h)-01 times,8(1)(i)-01 times, 8(1)(j)-37 times,  2(f)-14 times,  2(j)-02 times, 7(9)-02 times,   and  Others – 44  times (Total – 126 times).

(c)No. of appeals referred to CIC for review the nature of appeals and the outcome of appeals.

Nil

(d)Details of disciplinary action taken against any officer irrespective of this Act

NIL

(e) Amount of charges collected under this act. (Rs.)

8,225 /-

(f)Any fact, which indicate, an effort by the public authorities to administer and implement the spirit and intention of this Act.

More and more  of the information pertaining to various Branches of the Commission, including previous years question papers, internal guidelines, criteria for assessment of candidate for appointment on deputation basis, FAQs and  Record Retention Schedule of UPSC have been placed on the Website (www.upsc.gov.in). 

(g) Suitable suggestion for reform including those required for development, improvement, modernization reform for the amendment of the Act or other legislation or common law or any other matter relevant for operationalisation the Right to Access the Information

 

Fresh proposal of UPSC in this regard is with the Govt. of India.

 

 Back to Index Page

 

 

Furnishing of information to CIC under Sec. 25 of the RTI Act 2005

(Period from 01/01/2011 to 31/03/2011)

 

S.No.

Information pertaining to UPSC

(a)No. of requests received

604

(b)No. of decisions where applications were not entitled to access the document pursuant to the requests, the provisions of this Act under which these decisions were made and the number of times such provisions were invoked:

 60

Under section 8(1)(c)-01 time, 8(1)(d)-04 times,  8(1)(e)-8 times,  8(1)(i)-03 times, 8(1)(f)-2 times, 8(1)(j)- 17 times,  2(f)-6 times,  2(j)-01 times, 7(9)-01 time,   and  Others – 18  times (Total – 61  times).

(c)No. of appeals referred to CIC for review the nature of appeals and the outcome of appeals.

45 (Details enclosed).

(d)Details of disciplinary action taken against any officer irrespective of this Act

NIL

(e) Amount of charges collected under this act. (Rs.)

8,184 /-

(f)Any fact, which indicate, an effort by the public authorities to administer and implement the spirit and intention of this Act.

More and more  of the information pertaining to various Branches of the Commission, including previous years question papers, internal guidelines, criteria for assessment of candidate for appointment on deputation basis, FAQs and  Record Retention Schedule of UPSC have been placed on the Website (www.upsc.gov.in). 

(g) Suitable suggestion for reform including those required for development, improvement, modernization reform for the amendment of the Act or other legislation or common law or any other matter relevant for operationalisation the Right to Access the Information

 

Fresh proposal of UPSC in this regard is with the Govt. of India.

 

Back to Index Page

THE DETAILS OF CIC CASES (01/01/2011 TO 31/03/2011) 

1.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000804-SM was filed by Shri Arun Kumar Attree   with the CIC   seeking information concerning the CS Main Examination, 2008.  The CPIO, UPSC did not provide complete information.      The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2009/000804-SM  dated 12/1/2011,   directed UPSC to provide the remaining information, provided the information contained in the CD is found to be correct.  If it is not found correct the CPIO shall inform the appellant accordingly.    Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 2.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000948-SM was filed by Shri Pashupati Nath Singh with the CIC   seeking postal address telephone / mobile No. of some candidates in order to pursue marriage negotiation of his daughter.  CPIO declined the information under Section 8(1)(j).  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2009/000948-SM  dated 13/1/2011,   upheld the decision of CPIO and dismiss the appeal. 

 3.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000944-SM was filed by Shri Kumar Sauvir   with the CIC   seeking documents related to the Board constituted under the Chairmanship of Shri I.M.G. Khan, Member, UPSC.  CPIO denied the information under Section 8(1)(e)&(g).  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2009/000944-SM  dated 11/1/2011,   directed CPIO, UPSC to provide the photo copies of the relevant records as sought by the Appellant by applying deleting the names and other references from the records. Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 4.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000262 was filed by Shri Murlidhar Verma with the CIC   seeking information regarding the highest and lowest marks awarded to candidates from the SC Category in the CS Exam,2008.  The information was provided but rather very late.  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000262 dated 14/1/2011, directed the CPIO to dispose of RTI Application within the stipulated period.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 5.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000247 was filed by Shri Amarjeet Singh Cheema with the CIC   seeking information regarding the successful candidates of the CS Exam, 1983 along with those included in the supplementary lists recommended by the UPSC.  The CPIO had provided the list of candidates recommended by the UPSC without the marks awarded to each one of them.  No supplementary list had also been provided.     The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000247 dated 14/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the total marks obtained by the successful candidate in order of merit in the CSE 1983.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 6.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000318 was filed by Mrs. Urmila Jaiswal with the CIC   seeking information regarding the consolidated Reserve List of candidates in respect of the CPF(AC) Exam,2008.     CPIO, UPSC have provided some information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000318 dated 4/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete a list of all the names of the candidates included in the consolidated Reserve List maintained by the UPSC and a category-wise list of candidates recommended for appointment out of the reserve list.    Decision of the CIC was complied with the approval of the Commission.

7.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000880 was filed by Ashish Gupta with the CIC   seeking information regarding ddisclosure of raw marks awarded by the examiner to a candidate in the CSE,2009.  CPIO had provided some information.    The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000880 dated 4/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the desired information to the appellant, provided such information is available in the form it is sought.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 8.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000280 was filed by Shri Gopinath Jatti   with the CIC   seeking information regarding marks code by other candidates including him in CSE, 2007.  CPIO, UPSC provided his marks only.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000280 dated 7/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the marks awarded to other two candidates listed by him.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 9.       A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000221 was filed by Smt. Syed Saba Rizvi  with the CIC   seeking photo copy of the answer sheet of the Hindi subject.  The CPIO, UPSC did not provide information.  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000221 dated 7/2/2011, upheld the decision of the CPIO.  

 10.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000339 was filed by Shri A. Ranganathan  with the CIC   seeking information regarding the successful candidates of the CSE beginning in 1987.  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information in the manner in which it was sought.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000339 dated 8/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the readily available information with him.    Decision of the CIC was complied with.

11.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000392 was filed by Shri  Aneesh Arora  with the CIC   seeking information regarding CS Main Examination.  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information as records has been destroyed as per Record Retention Schedule.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000392 dated 8/2/2011, advise UPSC to instruct all concerned that while deciding to destroy any records as per the retention schedule, the CPIO(S) concerned should also be consulted to find out if any request for information relating to those records is still pending with them.  Decision of the CIC was complied with the approval of the Commission.

 12.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000616 was filed by Shri Niraj Kumar  with the CIC   seeking information  regarding own Roll Number and marks awarded to him in the CSE 1983 CPIO, UPSC did not provide information as records has been destroyed as per Record Retention Schedule.   .   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000616 dated 8/2/2011, held that since the desired information is no longer available in any form, we cannot help the Appellant in any manner.   

 13.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000041 was filed by Shri Shailesh  with the CIC   seeking information regarding  the highest mark ever scroed by any candidate in history paper in the CSE (Mains).  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information as it was not been maintained  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000041 dated 8/2/2011, upheld the decision of the CPIO, UPSC.

 14.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000439 was filed by SMT. Abha Gosain  with the CIC   seeking information regarding the marks obtained by her in the limited departmental examination for promotion to the rank of S.O./Stenos.    CPIO, UPSC has  provided some  information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000439 dated 4/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 15.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000795 was filed by SMT. Archana Monga with the CIC   seeking information regarding the question-wise breakup marks awarded to her in five different papers of S.O./P.S limited Departmental Competition Examination, 2005.    CPIO, UPSC denied the information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000795 dated 31/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC to provide the information if available.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 16.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000960 was filed by Shri Shamin Uddin  with the CIC   seeking information regarding the marks obtained by him in the limited departmental examination for promotion to the rank of S.O./Stenos.    CPIO, UPSC has  provided some  information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000960 dated 12/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 17.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000139 was filed by Shri K.P.J. Gerald  with the CIC   seeking information regarding the marks obtained by him in the limited departmental examination for promotion to the rank of S.O./Stenos.    CPIO, UPSC has  provided some  information except total marks in ACRs.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000139 dated 14/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 18.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000256 was filed by MS. M. Hari Kiran  with the CIC   seeking information regarding the marks obtained by him in the limited departmental examination for promotion to the rank of S.O./Stenos.    CPIO, UPSC has not  provided  information under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000256 dated 14/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information including marks in ACRs.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 19.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000265 was filed by Shri Ravi Jindal  with the CIC  complaining that CPIO, UPSC has not replied his RTI Application.     The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000265 dated 28/2/2011,  held that the Appellant had not availed opportunity to go to the first Appellate Authority and directed the first Appellate Authority to pass an order..  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 20.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/001012 was filed by Shri Ramanathan CS  with the CIC   seeking  list of recommended candidates for appointment on the basis of Engineering Service Exam 2008 and marks secured  by them.    CPIO, UPSC has  denied the   information under Section 8(1)(j).   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/001012 dated 12/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 21.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000755 was filed by Shri Satish Suman with the CIC   seeking information regarding  several details about candidates selected in Eng. Service Exam 2007 including the cut-off marks etc.    CPIO, UPSC has  provided some  information except cut-off marks.    The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000755 dated 13/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information including cut-off marks.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 22.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000951 was filed by Shri S. Papa Rao  with the CIC   seeking information regarding  marks awarded to him in the Indian Foreign Service, 1992.  CPIO, UPSC did not  provide the    information as his candidature was cancelled by UPSC.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000951 dated 7/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information if available.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 23.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000137 was filed by Shri G.N. Sudhakar  with the CIC   seeking information regarding  findings of Selection Committee.   CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information by claiming that it is held in fiduciary capacity.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000137 dated 13/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC that the desired information may be provided to the Appellant.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 24.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000010 was filed by Dr.Pradeep Singh  with the CIC   seeking copy of the Reserved list for the post of Director of Agriculture prepared ion 1998.   CPIO, UPSC did not provide the information as it was not available as  the validity of the Reserved list was only three years.  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000010 dated 13/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC  to provide the information and if it has been destroyed the CPIO must clearly indicate the year in which the records has been weeded out.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 25.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000935 was filed by Shri Udaya Kumara  with the CIC   seeking information regarding   the details of the candidates who had been invited for interview for the post of Dy. Govt. Counsel.    CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information by claiming that it is held in fiduciary capacity.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000935 dated 12/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC that the desired information may be provided to the Appellant.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

 26.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000681 was filed by Er. S. Kumar  with the CIC   seeking information on some hypothetical issue.   CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information as information sought by the appellant was in the form of opinion from CPIO .   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000681 dated 12/1/2011, upheld the decision of the CPIO.

 27.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000782-SM was filed by Shri D.B. Singh   with the CIC   seeking photo copies of the entire correspondence between the UPSC and the MCD relating to the two proposal to the posts of Executive Engg. And Suptt. Engg. In MCD.   CPIO, UPSC did not provide the information.       The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2009/000782-SM  dated 11/1/2011,   directed UPSC to provide the photo copies.  The decision of CIC was complied with the approval of the Commission.

28.     A 2nd Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000056 was filed by Shri N. Krishnamurthy    with the CIC regarding providing of photo copy and minutes of DPC including the ACRs gradings of all other officers.  CPIO provided the photo copy and minutes of DPC including ACR Grading in respect of him only.  CIC in its  decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000056-SM dated 13/1/2011 upheld the decision of the CPIO, UPSC.  

 29.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000814 was filed by Shri Aabi Binju  with the CIC   seeking the marks awarded to him both in the interview as well as against his ACR gradings along with the photocopies of the relevant documents.  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2009/000814 dated 11/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information.  It has been decided to implement the above orders of CIC.

 30.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000134 was filed by Shri K. Irisappan and R. Kothandaraman  with the CIC   seeking information regarding the promotion of Engineers, Govt. of Poducherry for a period of 10 years.  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000134 dated 13/1/2011, directed UPSC to provide the complete information.  Decision of the CIC was complied with the approval of the Commission.

 31.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000266 was filed by Ms. M. Joyti  with the CIC   seeking inspectionof documents including file notings and provide the photocopies of some of records.  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000266 dated 14/1/2011, directed UPSC to allow inspection of documents including file notings and provide the photo copies of some of records free of cost.  In compliance of CIC orders the appellant has been requested to inspect the available file.  

 32.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000627 was filed by Shri K.K. Gupta  with the CIC   seeking copy of the sheet containing the evaluation of the ACRs.   CPIO, UPSC did not provide information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000627 dated 03/2/2011, directed UPSC to open the sealed cover and to inform the Appellant about the year-wise ACRs considered by both the original and the review DPCs separately, and also to inform him about the grading awarded to him year-wise in the review DPC only.  The direction of the CIC has been compiled with the approval of the Commission.

 33.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000745 was filed by Shri H.K. Bansal  with the CIC  seeking information on DPC files .  CPIO, UPSC suggested to inspect the relevant file available.  But appellant did not turn up for inspection.     The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000745 dated 3/2/2011, directed UPSC to invite the applicant and show him all the available files in this regard.  After inspection, if the Appellant would choose to get the photocopies of some of the records from those files, the CPIO shall provide the same to him free of charge.  The direction of the CIC has been compiled with the approval of the Commission.

 34.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000016 was filed by Shri P.C. Sanghi  with the CIC   seeking the copy of the assessment sheet for the DPC showing the grading against the ACRs of all the officers who had been considered for promotion.  CPIO, UPSC did not provide information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000016 dated 4/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the the photo copy of the relevant assessment sheet by opening the sealed cover, if any,  However, if the assessment sheet is found to contain the names of such officers about whom the DPC has decided to keep the recommendation in a sealed cover until the completion of the vigilance/disciplinary proceedings pending against them, in that case, the relevant entries from the assessment sheet regarding these officers should be deleted/severed before disclosing the assessment sheet.  It has been decided to implement the above orders of CIC.

35.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000525 was filed by Shri Rajeev Kumar  with the CIC  seeking information regarding the DPCs held outside Delhi during 2008-09 and 2009-10 and the expenditure incurred on such meetings.    The CPIO did not provide the information.  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000525 dated 4/2/2011, decided that the applicant can approach the CPIO again for information on one or a few specific DPC(s) held outside of Delhi.     There was no  direction for UPSC in this regard from CIC.

 36.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000329 was filed by  Dr. Manish Shrivastava  with the CIC  seeking marks awarded to appellant in the PT, Bio-data and ACRs.  The CPIO did not provide the complete information.  The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000329 dated 8/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the marks awarded to him in PT, Bio-data and ARCs even if it means opening of any sealed cover and severing of any names or other references of the kind stated above.  The direction of the CIC has been compiled with the approval of the Commission.

 37.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000585 was filed by Shri S.D. Bind  with the CIC  seeking information regarding his assessment by that DPC as well as the copies of the record showing why he was not found fit.  The CPIO did not provide the complete information.     The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000585 dated 8/2/2011, directed UPSC to provide the appellant copy of the assessment sheet of the said DPC only in relation to the assessment of the Appellant even if it means opening the sealed cover, if any and the copy of the relevant proceedings of the DPC in which it was held that the Appellant was unfit for promotion.   The direction of the CIC has been compiled with the approval of the Commission.

 38.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000713 was filed by Shri Ashok Kumar Singh  with the CIC   seeking information/clarification which was voluminous.   CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information .    The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000713 dated 13/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC to allow the appellant for inspection of the records.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

39.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000950 was filed by Shri D.K. Deshpande  with the CIC   seeking status of his application addressed to Secretary, UPSC.   CPIO, UPSC has informed that his application has been filed being devoid of merit.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000950 dated 12/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC to provide photo copy of relevant file notings in which his application was processed.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

40.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000769 was filed by Shri Abhe Singh Yadav with the CIC   seeking photo copy of assessment sheet of officers considered by Selection Committee.  CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000769 dated 18/1/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC that the desired information may be provided to the Appellant.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

41.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000238 was filed by Shri Baleshwar Nath  with the CIC   complaining that CPIO, UPSC has not furnished the complete information.      The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000238 dated 28/2/2011, held that  the appellant has not approached the first Appellate Authority and directed Appellate Authority  UPSC to dispose of the Appeal.  Decision of the CIC was complied with.

42.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000343 was filed by Shri A.P. Shah  with the CIC   seeking  copy of the order of DoP&T advising imposition of penalty.  CPIO, UPSC clarified that no such order exist.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000343 dated 8/2/2011,  held since no such orders exist, the appeal is rejected.   

 43.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000242 was filed by Shri Girija Prasad Rai  with the CIC   seeking information about the decision taken by UPSC on the reference made by the Railway Board in his case.  CPIO, UPSC informed that the documents has been returned to Railway Board.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000242 dated 7/2/2011, held that since CPIO have nothing more to inform the appellant, the appeal is rejected.

 44.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000572 was filed by Shri M.K. Agrawal  with the CIC   seeking  copies of large number of records including file noting concerning the advice tendered by the UPSC.     CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000572 dated 7/2/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC that the desired information may be provided to the Appellant.   UPSC has decided to file a Writ Petition in the High Court against the decision of CIC.   

 45.     A 2nd appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2010/000362 was filed by Shri Brijesh Kumar   with the CIC   seeking  advice tendered by the UPSC for imposing major penalty on officer of IAS,IFS and IPS.    CPIO, UPSC has denied the   information.   The Hon’ble CIC in its decision No.CIC/WB/A/2010/000362 dated 4/2/2011, directed CPIO, UPSC to provide the copy of the advice letter along with file notings. UPSC  has decided to file a Writ Petition in the High Court against the decision of CIC. 

 Back to Index Page